top of page

QualPro Helps University Choose Marketing Mix for Donation Increase

THE CHRONICLE OF PHILANTHROPY

Connecting the nonprofit world with news, jobs, and ideas

July 24, 2011

An Alumnus Teaches a University How to Double Its Donations

Patrick Murphy-Racey, for e Chronicle

Charles W. Holland donated his company’s consulting services to help Lincoln Memorial University,

his alma mater, improve its fund raising, increase enrollment, and attract students with higher test

scores.

By Holly Hall

 

Charles W. Holland could turn out to be one of the most generous donors to his alma mater—and

to nonprofit organizations everywhere.

 

Mr. Holland donated his company’s management-consulting skills to Lincoln Memorial University,

a Tennessee institution that in just one year has doubled its contributions to $4-million without

adding a single fund raiser or spending any new money. That achievement comes at a time when the slow economic recovery has meant most colleges barely eke out any increases at all, according to the Council for Aid to Education.

 

University officials say they’re just getting started on their way to making gifts soar.

 

Cynthia Whitt, Lincoln Memorial’s vice president for advancement, says Mr. Holland’s ideas

have “brought discipline and energy to fund raising.”

Testing Multiple Ideas

 

Mr. Holland, who holds a Ph.D. in statistics,

is the founder of QualPro, a Knoxville, Tenn.,

consulting company that has spent nearly 30 years

working with more than 1,000 organizations,

including many Fortune 500 manufacturers.

Over the years, the company has branched out,

working first with service companies, then with

political campaigns, and now even a few nonprofit

organizations, including private schools, hospitals,

and others.

 

Organizations use Mr. Holland’s process to test

new approaches to save millions of dollars

while greatly increasing revenues. At the core of

his methods are sophisticated statistical analyses

that help groups simultaneously test dozens of

ideas for improvement. In its first year working

with Mr. Holland, Lincoln Memorial used

the process to try out more than two dozen fund-

raising ideas such as taking yearbooks along on

visits to donors, changing the timing of appeals

to the annual fund, and promoting donations

to build new dorms in the university’s alumni

magazine.

 

Guided by Mr. Holland or another

QualPro consultant, such experiments allow

organizations to quickly sort out which

ideas help, which ones hurt, and which ones

make no difference.

 

The QualPro approach, while not without critics,

has been endorsed by numerous corporate leaders.

 

It is somewhat similar to other statistical

improvement methods such as Six Sigma, a

method used by General Electric and other

large companies to improve profits by eliminating

weaknesses and waste. While Six Sigma focuses

on improving existing processes, Mr. Holland’s

approach also seeks to include new, never-before-

tried ideas.

 

Carson-Newman College, in Jefferson City,

Tenn., recently used QualPro’s methods to test

whether it should open a new campus in

Knoxville. It now plans to open the campus

because QualPro showed that plenty of students

will enroll in the master’s degree program it

will offer there. The tests also determined that

students had a keen interest in one new idea

Testing Lots of Ideas at Once to

Improve Results

 

Here’s a sampling of the 30 tests conducted simultaneously by

Lincoln Memorial University, which doubled its fund-raising

returns in one year with help from QualPro, a Knoxville, Tenn.,

company.

 

BIG GIFTS

 

Demonstrate a fund raiser’s commitment

Fund raisers told donors about their personal philosophy on

charitable giving and about their own donations to the university.

Results: No difference in the number or size of gifts.

 

Give out promotional brochures

Some fund raisers gave donors brochures that featured students

graduating or reaching career milestones such as practicing medi-

cine.

Results: No difference in the number or size of gifts.

 

Ask donors about campus memories

Fund raisers urged alumni to flip through a yearbook and remi-

nisce about their favorite faculty members.

Results: Gifts increased in size and number.

 

SMALL GIFTS

Add a splash of color

A direct-mail appeal was enclosed in a bright red envelope instead

of the university’s standard business envelope.

Results: No difference in number or size of gifts.

 

Use bigger type

A direct-mail appeal for the annual fund was sent using a bigger

letter font.

Results: No difference in number or size of gifts.

 

Get ahead of the holidays

Some appeals were mailed two weeks ahead of

anksgiving and some just after.

Results: More people gave to the mailing sent before thanksgiv-

ing.

 

Spell out needs

An appeal for the university’s museum listed what items it hoped

to buy, such as a letter written by Abraham Lincoln, for whom

the university is named.

Results: Gifts increased in size and number.

 

Emphasize lifetime membership in the alumni association

The university tested whether people would donate $200 for a

lifetime membership with a direct-mail appeal that emphasized

that offer—but also gave people the option of paying annual

dues.

Results: More people chose the lifetime option

the college hasn’t ever tried, which could provide a

big advantage over competing programs: “academic

success coaches” who would work with students to help

them complete the degree. The college now plans to make such coaches available.

 

Enrollment Gains

 

To be sure, Mr. Holland’s services don’t come cheap.

A typical consultation for a nonprofit organization,

which can last from several weeks to a few months,

costs around $150,000, though QualPro’s policy is

to accept only those clients it thinks will earn five times

as much as they paid the company during the first year

of the consultation. However, because Mr. Holland sits

on the board of Lincoln Memorial, where he obtained

an undergraduate degree in mathematics, he decided

to donate virtually all of QualPro’s services to his alma

mater.

 

He assigned two QualPro consultants to the university.

Dana Thompson has concentrated on improving its

fund raising, while another QualPro expert worked

to increase enrollment and attract more students with

high scores on entrance exams. Enrollment gains

have been impressive, with a nearly 20-percent rise in

new applicants and a more than 80-percent increase in

the number with high test scores.

 

Statistician Required

 

To improve the university’s fund-raising returns, Mr.

Thompson guided Lincoln Memorial through a rigorous

process that lasted several months, and he evaluated

more than 25 ideas to increase contributions.

Organizations can learn to use the QualPro approach

themselves, but Mr. Holland says they must enlist a

trained statistician to design and interpret the results of

what are often dozens of simultaneous experiments. At

Lincoln Memorial, Mr. Thompson and his colleagues

undertook the following steps:

 

Brainstorm ideas to increase contributions.

 

Mr. Thompson guided Lincoln Memorial fund raisers

through a review of contributions over the past several

years to identify times during which giving peaked or

ebbed and to look for other patterns that might suggest

ideas. But even though tweaking ideas that have worked

before sometimes make a big difference, he told fund

raisers not to obsess over the past, because odds are that

the best ideas are those never previously tried.

He didn’t stop with just the 15-member fund-raising

staff. He also reached out to university officials,

students, parents, and others to come up with new

ideas. The result: more than 200 ideas about how

the university could increase its fund-raising returns.

 

Decide which ideas to test. 

 

With Mr. Thompson’s help, Lincoln Memorial chose to test seven ideas to increase large gifts and 23 ideas to increase small

ones.

 

They selected only ideas that would cost nothing

to try and could be tested without hurting fund-raising

efforts already under way. QualPro also looked for ideas

that, if they worked, could be put to use right away on a

broad scale.

 

To reach major donors, the university tested how well

it worked for fund raisers to talk about their own

personal contributions to Lincoln Memorial or how

the institution uses money. Another idea was for fund

raisers to take a yearbook along to help donors recall

their favorite faculty members.

 

Ideas for improving small gifts included adding a survey

about the university’s homecoming activities to annual-

fund appeals, asking for annual-fund donations

before Thanksgiving instead of after, shortening

the annual-fund letter, and including a wish list of

items sought by the university’s museum in a mailing

to visitors and other potential donors.

 

Try out the fund-raising ideas.

 

Mr. Thompson helped Lincoln Memorial divide 22,000 alumni into 60 groups to test ideas to change mass solicitations. To test

the seven ideas for increasing large gifts, four fund

raisers made visits to a total of 136 donors.

 

For the trials, Mr. Thompson designed 64 experiments.

But before they began, he met with the fund-raising

staff to make sure each person understood and agreed

on exactly how each experiment would be conducted,

how results would be recorded, and their role in

the tests.

 

And while each idea was tested with two alumni

groups or with two big donors, Mr. Thompson

also conducted a series of experiments to help verify

results by reversing conditions to see whether that

caused an opposite result. Taken together, the two types

of experiments give a clearer picture of the true effects

of a new idea. Then fund raisers conduced more tests of

the ideas that led to improvements to find further ways

to improve results.

Assess test results.

 

Of all the fund-raising ideas that Lincoln Memorial tested, only a small percentage increased giving. But that’s to be expected, Mr. Holland says.

 

After completing some 16,000 tests for more than 1,000

organizations, he says, QualPro has learned that only

25 percent of all the ideas it tests help an organization

improve, while 53 percent make no difference, and 22

percent make things worse.

 

For example, out of Lincoln Memorial’s seven ideas

to increase large gifts, only two worked: telling donors

that “we need your support” and bringing along a

yearbook to spark a conversation about a donor’s

favorite faculty members. The yearbook idea worked

the best by far, increasing both the number and size of

donations.

 

And among the ideas for increasing smaller gifts, a wish

list in mailings to seek donations for the university’s

museum increased donations, as did sending

out Lincoln Memorial’s annual-fund solicitation

before Thanksgiving and shortening the pitch letter it

included.

 

But a photograph of a handsome new residence hall in

a student-housing solicitation, another idea that both

board members and fund raisers thought would work,

backfired with the alumni who received it, says Ms.

Whitt, the vice president for advancement. Ms. Whitt

believes it probably turned off older alumni, whose own

dormitories were far more spartan.

 

Applying the QualPro approach requires a lot of

extra work for any group that uses it, Ms. Whitt and

others say. But it also offers benefits beyond rapid

improvements. One is improved morale stemming from

the fact that anyone, even the lowest level employees,

are invited to suggest ideas for improvement. Another

is that employees can see the returns of their efforts

relatively quickly.

 

At Lincoln Memorial, fund raisers “were excited

to be engaged in a process where they could actually

know for sure what works,” says Mr. Thompson. “They

were jazzed because it was an opportunity to really learn.”

They will soon have another chance: Mr. Thompson is

now putting the finishing touches on another round of

experiments that will test ideas for improving donations

and attendance during Lincoln Memorial’s homecoming

weekend in October

bottom of page